Total Pageviews
Saturday, 29 June 2019
Tuesday, 25 June 2019
Brown bears to be reintroduced to woods near Bristol after council gives permission
Still chasing up this story that was first published on 4th July last year (2018). Considering that Bristol Zoo has been getting criticism about the loud parties it holds (events) and the affect it might have on the animals there some good ideas might be worth supporting -particularly if it means educating the public on wolves.
If I get any new information I wll post it here.
Story:
Bear Wood could reopen in time for next summer, and will house brown bears as well as lynx, wolves and wolverine in woodlands
A multi-million pound plan to return bears to ancient woodland on the outskirts of Bristol has been given the go ahead.
South Gloucestershire Council has approved the ambitious £5million scheme, which was put forward by conservationists at Wild Place Project earlier this year.
The council’s approval means the scheme - called Bear Wood - could reopen in time for next summer, and will house brown bears as well as lynx, wolves and wolverine in woodlands.
Nigel Simpson, head of operations at Wild Place Project, said: “We are thrilled to announce we have been given the go-ahead for this scheme.
The Girt Dog Of Ennerdale
The Girt Dog Of Ennerdale
A4
42pp
Paperback
B&W
Illustrated
£10.00
Over 200 years ago, in 1810, sheep were being killed in the Ennerdale area of Cumbria . The sheep were allegedly hardly eaten yet their blood had been drained and the killer responsible thwarted the efforts of organised hunts and terrified hounds.
What was the “Girt Dog” of Ennerdale? Many theories abound from a paranormal creature called a “Mauler” to an escaped hyena , Tiger or even a Thylacine. Perhaps an unknown species of native British big cat?
The truth of what the “Girt Dog” was lies within the original accounts of the time. Documents that modern writers appear to have never consulted.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
It is ridiculous that I have to do this but I have now been contacted by journalists and two 'Big Cat hunters' (with a total of 5 years 'experience').
I began acting as an exotic fauna consultant to UK police forces in 1976/1977 ans semi retired in 2015 but still get consulted by police and other organisations every so often.My Exotic Animals Register (EAR) files are confidential and there is no intention of releasing these.
Let me make the following also clear:
1) I have not and will never forward case reports with information identifying witnesses
2) I have not "passed on" my work of investigating and studying exotic fauna whether felids or canids in the UK to anyone or any organisation whether "cryptozoological" or not. My standpoint on "cryptozoology" is well known as are my opinions on some of those involved in this sham.
3) Absolutely no one has the right to identify themselves as "members of the Exotic Animals Register" or of acting on its behalf. If anyone does then they will face legal action for bringing my name and that of the EAR into disrepute. I also urge that anyone identifying themselves as such should be reported to the local police.
4) I work with no one other than police wildlife crimes or other officers.
5) The EAR/myself does not mount "expeditions" to trap large felids. Trapping any wild animal has serious consequences and there are very strict laws governing this activity.
My field of speciality are canids and felids as well as the 40 year long study of wild living wolverine in the UK. When my study is completed then the appropriate bodies will receive copies of my final report.
From what I have seen and heard the people involved in this or these "Big Cat Studies" -it is so ridiculous that I cannot even ascertain whether there are two or three groups out there or just one incompetent one.
'Facts' quoted appear to be taken from old EAR information sheets that I stopped producing around 2005 as well as some statements that show whoever is involved has no idea what type of cat(s) are in the UK or much about them. The 'origins' of these "big cats" is so ludicrously incorrect as I, working with a university, established and even identified sources that had nothing to do with the 1976 Dangerous Wild Animals Act.
I am easily contactable but please note the above. I am the only person working as the EAR.
I began acting as an exotic fauna consultant to UK police forces in 1976/1977 ans semi retired in 2015 but still get consulted by police and other organisations every so often.My Exotic Animals Register (EAR) files are confidential and there is no intention of releasing these.
Let me make the following also clear:
1) I have not and will never forward case reports with information identifying witnesses
2) I have not "passed on" my work of investigating and studying exotic fauna whether felids or canids in the UK to anyone or any organisation whether "cryptozoological" or not. My standpoint on "cryptozoology" is well known as are my opinions on some of those involved in this sham.
3) Absolutely no one has the right to identify themselves as "members of the Exotic Animals Register" or of acting on its behalf. If anyone does then they will face legal action for bringing my name and that of the EAR into disrepute. I also urge that anyone identifying themselves as such should be reported to the local police.
4) I work with no one other than police wildlife crimes or other officers.
5) The EAR/myself does not mount "expeditions" to trap large felids. Trapping any wild animal has serious consequences and there are very strict laws governing this activity.
My field of speciality are canids and felids as well as the 40 year long study of wild living wolverine in the UK. When my study is completed then the appropriate bodies will receive copies of my final report.
From what I have seen and heard the people involved in this or these "Big Cat Studies" -it is so ridiculous that I cannot even ascertain whether there are two or three groups out there or just one incompetent one.
'Facts' quoted appear to be taken from old EAR information sheets that I stopped producing around 2005 as well as some statements that show whoever is involved has no idea what type of cat(s) are in the UK or much about them. The 'origins' of these "big cats" is so ludicrously incorrect as I, working with a university, established and even identified sources that had nothing to do with the 1976 Dangerous Wild Animals Act.
I am easily contactable but please note the above. I am the only person working as the EAR.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Dad on school run snaps 'massive' big cat 'size of a jaguar' in woods behind playground -or does he?
My first thought was that this was a silly story and after a lot of consideration I decided it definitely WAS a silly story. A dad drops h...
-
The following from an exotic rescue is indicative of a problem we face today with kitchen-sink exotic animal breeders. Back up to the late...
-
I have since 1976 struggled when it comes to getting any type of cooperation on the fox Study. Generally, academic institutions and, of cour...
-
I was alerted to this post fairly quickly on Sunday (30th March) by my colleague, LM. Before this got on to any of the British 'big cat...