Total Pageviews

Monday 25 April 2022

Some 250 Pumas and 250 Black Leopards in the UK?


The idiot fringe has always been happy to throw out ridiculous population estimates for large cats in the UK. The late Quentin Rose (between threatening to sue me and asking for more information on cats) made some guesses. Pretend nu8mbers really and at two points told different reporters that there could be over 700 "big cats" in the UK and moving into suburban areas. One has to remember that Quentin's full time job was making money (unsuccessfully) tracki9ng and attempting to shoot these cats. Essex Police told me that for some advice he was paid over £300 and he offered to "track down the cat in question (a puma seen two days before) for over £1000.

Others have suggested that panthers (black leopards) have to have a breeding population of over 1000 nationally.  I remember once being handed that figure by a reporter who got it from "the best authority" -a cryptozoologist.

In the wild a leopard can have a territory as small as 10-12 square kilometres to several hundred square kilometres. With plenty of prey around the UK including muntjac, rabbits and deer of other types a leopard could move from Aberdeen to Kent quite easily the distance between  the two points 6,958 kilometres which sounds a lot but is only 425 miles. Females seem to keep smaller territories.

When it comes to pumasthe size of male territories which can measure between 58 to 386 square miles or 150-999.75 square kilometres.  We know that a male puma we had recording had a much bigger territory than the female we were also keeping an eye on. We also know that this pair had at least two sets of young.

Again, there are millions of wild rabbits, millions of deer and rats as well as birds that any cat can kill and eat and they will never go into towns or cities. The British countryside is "good living" for these cats.

We do know that they have been breeding and successfully but as DEFRA will not allow trap-radio collar-release we have no idea about mortality rates amongst the cats. I have two recent reports of large dead cats at the side of very dangerous motorways where it was impossible to stop and one of those cappears to have been a puma (report from a trusted source). On the Belgian-Netherlands motorway in the early 1980s I saw a road kill panther and the two policemen I spoke to at the next stop point shrugged and said "Yes. So what?"


We could be talking 10-15 panthers or pumas and, as they might in the wild with other cats, they would be avoiding each other if territories even overlapped but as we are talking a small number of each cat that is very unlikely to happen.

Starting in Scotland any cat could move though fields surrounded by hedgerows, through woods and forests, over hills and through valleys and many other habitats that it could hunt and rest in. Look at any map of Britain and the topographical features.

We can never know for 100% certainty but going by normal cat habitat and behaviour I would never go above 50 of any larger cat species. Look at the map above and at any point the cat could move down into North Wales or head SW to Somerset, Devon and Cornwall. And they do not live in family groups.

I have worked on this subject for 45 years day in and day out and the population of both cats as far as can be told has remained constant and in some areas are known and encouraged as they create stronger and healthier deer.

But any figure over 50 individuals from each species is fantasy.

Thursday 21 April 2022

DEFRA and "Big Cat" Debunking

 

Above: bones of one of the foals killed by a puma and markings on the bones show a large cat was involed -UK

I need to make something very clear and that is that we do have large cats in the UK and the claim that DEFRA "debunked" the subject is interesting. Firstly the term "debunked" usually gets used to mean its a cover up or hanging facts to fit a picture that someone wants promoted.

During 1997 I visited DEFRA offices in Bristol and spoke to the person who was the "official spokesman" ion "UK Big Cats" and I asked if he had worked at a zoo? "Oh, no. My manager came in one day and told me I had to cover the subject and gave me the public response sheet". He added "We can call on experts though" He then opened an old map type drawer in which were plaster casts with labels "identification Lynx" and "identification pums" and as I asked questions he panicked and realised that he was not dealing with someone sent from London (this account is recorded on this blog).

Over the years 1977-2015 I had many phone conversations with MAFF, DETR and DEFRA and it was a free flowing conversation as I was also on the official Partners Against Wildlife Crime (PAWS) list as an expert. Officially, in writing, the same public statement of cat reports but no evidence of breeding. So, there were exotic cats out there. I spoke to some involved in the Beast of  Exmoor Enquiry and a lot of evidence that was to be presented was not because of "minimal enquiry finances" and the evidence rejected included plaster casts of pawprints, several hair samples and at least two noted naturalists who had observed cats on several occasions. Even video footage from a wildlife park security camera that recorded a puma that had broken in then left.

DEFRA like MAFF told anyone concerned about a big cat sighting to contact local police who could assess the situation and decide whether fire arms and a search was required. Just to add that I have the Home Office letter on what the public should do if they see a large cat. Also, DEFRA has spent a lot of money employing people such as the late Quentin Rose to go out and try to shoot large cats.

Lots of money and time to waste on "nothing". Also, what about the farmers who had livestock losses and had MAFF/DEFRA  inspectors go to photograph and confirm the kills and what had caused to deaths? National Farmers Union had dealings with MAFF/DEFRA on livestock losses down to large predators and DEFRA like MAFF suggested various ways of dealing with the situation. Over something that does not exist?

Why did DEFRA ask farmers to report live stock deaths caused by large predators to them and not to contact me -I was named specifically?  There are incidents on record and some of them have been noted on this blog.

Again, why, when a zoo assembled a team to trap and radio collar a regularly sighted and wild born puma did MAFF make very clear threats of prosecution if we did not (1)kill or (2) put any cat caught into a zoo or wildlife park. If we released the cat with a radio collar to gather scientific data -there would be prosecutions.  More legal threats over something that does not exist?

Why did the Welsh Chief Veterinary Officer discuss with me her working on livestock deaths in Wales alongside DEFRA before realising her mistake -which she confirmed to others later? Why was she working on livestock kills by "feline predator" if they do not exist?

Another question; I got to find out that cat associated kills were being grabbed quickly and I was even shown a memorandum stating the kills should be seized before I could get any evidence -local DEFRA men even told farmers this. And I found out where the carcasses were being taken.  At that point, and having also got affidavits that DEFRA vets had "euthenized" a panther at one location (back up by a statement from the local Police Wildlife Officer) and puma at another DEFRA decided that unless I handed over all maps and information on exotic animals -cats and others- I was not going to be allowed on the PAWS list any longer. 

I had two chief constables plus other  senior police officers backing to be on the PAWS list which made it awkward for DEFRA. Therefore, my registration form was filled out incorrectly (after 20 years!) and I filled in one then another and another until I had filled in 15 registration forms and every time something else was 'wrong'. Eventually one chief constable tried to find out what was going on and told me later "Whatever you do they are not going to ever let you back on the list. They do not like the work you have done"

A bit personal and a lot of effort over looking into things that do not exist? Oddly, a known hoaxer was allowed on to the PAWS list!

All of my peers are long since dead. No one in the UK has been investigating and researching exotic animals in the UK longer than I have (since 1977) and I have contributed to technical papers and worked with many bodies over that time. 

I have looked at local environments as well as flora and fauna in each area where cats have been sighted. I have a collection of photographs of sheep and horses killed by a large cat and secondary confirmation of cats being responsible from others.  I have zoologists who have seen large cats close-to. Naturalists have seen then and the British Naturalist Association Hon. Sec. confirmed to me when I joined that there were known to be large cats in the UK -she and another member of the BNA committee had even seen one.

I have the photographs showing very clear (and techinically measured) bite marks in the neck of a horse plus the claw marks were the cat's claws had sunk in. Oh, yes, one 'expert' (X= The Unknown and "Spurt" is a drip under pressure) stated the wounds were due to a badger attack.  Later missing foal skeletons were found and an expert in the field wrote a paper on the fact that the bones indicated a large cat had killed the foals.

All "pure fantasy" of course.

The director of London Zoo even identified large cat pawprints in the 1990s -in the press and on TV.

I am not a kooky idiot sat reading Fortean Times or watching You Tube or reading trash books to get my "big cat education". Anyone reporting a cat sighting to me gets a lot of questions asked and the local area is looked at and I have crammed document files -which DEFRA at one point threatened to legally seize from me (legally they could not).  Threats over data and maps on something that "does not exist"?

I was once told by a MAFF man in the presence of a senior Member of Parliament that the reasons for denying large cats in the UK might be down to the financial costs -farmers suing over being called liars over the years and so on.

In zoology, whether you are a lowly naturalist or fully paid zoologist you go by evidence. For instance someone reports a boar in woodland. You note that down but wait until you get confirmation of a second boar or even group of boar.  You hear of a sow with young that is evidence of breeding. Everything from birds to amphibians it is standard. Same with "exotics" -we know wallabies have been in the UK since the 19th century and that they have successfully bred and we've assessed that they are not having a negative environmental impact.

All of the standard rules are thrown out when it comes to large or medium sized cats. A lynx is sighted with a smaller cat near it. No. A puma is sighted by a naturalist and it was accompanied by two smaller puma cubs. No. Five people, none of whom knows any of the others report sightings of what, based on size and description, was a puma accompanied by two smaller puma cubs all within the space of a week around a certain small town. No.

"They could not live in the UK"? Well, lynx could, panthers could and so could pumas. There is enough habitat and certainly enough prey with millions of wild rabbits and millions of deer from various species (muntjac seem to be a favourite), wild fowl, rats and so on and so forth.

We are NOT talking about "hundreds" of these cats in the UK. That was something I looked at along with some university people and we realised that a national population even with breeding would be far, far lower. 

If DEFRA declared that in reassessing the evidence it found there were large cats in the UK there would be an initial furore with the press but then, as with other declarations on other matters, things quieten down and the naturalist can get to work on studying the cats. No big mystery anymore and livestock kills by cats could be included on farm insurance alongside dog attack kills.

I know that people involved in "big cat" groups check out this blog. Here is my challenge to them: submit your evidence to me to be assessed and form the basis of a much larger data base that zoologists can access and study. Prove DEFRA and the debunking faction to be totally wrong. Prove you are not fantasists.

Simple.

Email me blacktowercg@hotmail.com or contact me via the EAR Face Book messenger initially.  https://www.facebook.com/groups/372804871017547

Above: Puma scat -UK

Monday 18 April 2022

Wild Menagerie -Britain's New Native Species

 




Back in the 1990s I was asked to submit a series of articles for a newspaper. The articles were rejected because some of the content seemed to be critical of "gentry" in the past who had descendents running running newspapers. Another newspaper then got interested but was interested in hiring people to trap or kill one of the animals I was writing about.

Yes, that was really not going to work with me -even if I needed the money.

Instead I wrote some more localised articles for County magazines. These were gloss publications aimned at the better off folks and were cheap-skates of the highest order when it came to payment but what was a struggling writer to do?

The original articles were under the series title I am using as this blog header. They are basically background and to inform the Reader of what is the new fauna of the UK and, perhaps, at some point in the future. it will be fauna that the Department for Environment Farminga nd Ruaral Affairs (DEFRA) will stop killing. We are, after all, in 2022.

I have left the articles as they were written in the 1990s plus a few corrections.

_____________________________________

 Back in 1975 a very young, moustached naturalist was talking and writing to people in Surrey, Wales, Devon and Cornwall and trying to gather accurate information on a specific type of animal, or rather "animals" the so called "big cats" to be precise.

There had been the usual jokey items on TV and radio news as well as the national press about "over-sized pussycats" and how some people "cutting back on the cider might decrease the number of sightngs".  One thing I had noted was that the majority of reports were nowhere near pubs, not after closing hours and in good viewing conditions.

As a naturalist I did not actually believe that cats sighted were anything other than temporary escapees.

I had been in touch with, and gotten great cooperation from, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) over unusual sea creatures washed ashore on the British coast (Dead aquatic Creatures of Canvey Island, Essex covered in Some Things Strange & Sinister and updated in Pursuing The Strange & Weird -A Naturalist's Viewpoint) so I thought I would try them first.

I think the giggling over the phone and the polite joking in letters said it all.

According to MAFF there were no big cats or large cats of any kind living feral in the UK, though various people had reported sighting large grey and also black cata but "These were probably dogs seen under unusual or poor viewing conditions".  I referred to certain reports I had looked into up to that point but was told "all dogs".  I got the distinct impression that no one was really interested in the subject except for one MAFF man who was retiring and when I spoke to him he told me: 

"Yes, I've no doubts there are some about since the DWA (Dangerous Wild Animals Act) came in but how many goodness knows. Officially, of course, it's all dogs!"

Above: said to be the first ever image of the Surrey Puma. No scale and just going by the body/head I'd say domestic cat.

Broaching the subject with farmers and other witnesses I mentioned the MAFF response -and learnt some very new swear words. In the (then) twenty-four years afterthe DWA came into force the situation between farmers and MAFF, DETRA and now DEFRA have not improved on the matter. 

What surprised me was how many zoologists and naturalists were quick to dismiss the idea of large cats living wild in the UK and they showed a true "blind eyes of science" attitude. The late Arthur Cadman was the exception. Arthur was a life long naturalist who had helped to design and plant the Welsh new forests in the 1930s (where he told me he had seen some unusual animals); he was deputy surveyor of the New Forest - the commission's top officer in the area - from 1959 until 1968I linked up with Arthur in 1977 and discussed my own wildlife observations in German forests and, of course, cats in the UK. I asked him about sightings in Scotland and received a typical forthright response based on his own observations. He knew of cats in Wales and pointed out that the environment there was perfect for them and knew the country inside-out but had never seen a large cat there. Scotland was another matter.

In the Inverness-shire area he had been keeping an eye on a group of six adult and juvenile pumas on a regular basis. On two occasions later, in 1979, he told me that two others had made livestock kills in the area and that these cats had appeared from out of nowhere. There was one old female that seemed to be having a problem walking and hunting and Arthur was worried as he felt that she might be the one to get shot or trapped. In point of fact she was later trapped (1980)  and was named "Felicity" but luckily she got to live out her remaining years in the Aviemore wildlife park. Following her death Felicity (named after the actress Felicity Kendall) was stuffed and mounted.

 
Above Felicity in a publicity photo (after death of course)

Update: As far as I can tell all of Arthur's papers on the cats are gone. Although I have tried to contact his family (he died in 2001) but no joy.

What Arthur was doing in Scotland the Reverend Gwillam Thomas was doing in Wales. Sadly, I cannot find anything out about the man. Thomas had seen his first puma at the mouth of the Rhondda Valley in the 1920s. This was followed by a second sighting of a puma near Builth Wells in the 1930s. I never got to speak to Thomas but the late John Green did so and told me that he had looked over some of the maps, notes, plaster casts, drawings and even photographs of puma -all lost after his death  in the early 1990s.

Part of the problem in finding out more about Gwillam Thomas is that this may have been a pseudonym. John's wife recalled the books on Wales written by the man that John had shown her, however, she knew her late husband was very protective of his sources and could not remember the correct name and all the papers had been collected by another cat researcher who she thought was associated with me. 

For Arthur and the (might be) Gwillam Thomas this was lifelong work undertaken as naturalists and avoiding all the publicity and the media circus. Essential in this work but we have lost so much work because of that secrecy.


Above: the puma is not a member of the Big Cat family but of the Medium Sized cats

The much mentioned Dangerous Wild Animals Act (1976) is not what sparked off the big cat phenomenon (though there is only one member of the Big Cat family in the UK). At one point I had managed to track free living cats -lynx, pumas and panthers (black leopards) back to the 1800s. However, this can be pushed much further back to at least the 10th Century AD.


Above: the panther (melanistic leopard) is the only member of the Big Cat family in the UK and is far smaller than many claim -certainly NOT calf sized!

Probably the biggest source of former exotic animals which have bred in the wild and become native were the travelling menageries as well as big estate private menageries and other static menageries spread around the UK. These existed for centuries and there were no laws until the DWA in 1976.

The Romans brought "pets" and exotic mascots such as lions etc.. Some exotics were used for 'entertainment' in the arenas that brought "a little touch of Rome" to Britain. Some of these may have become escapees or handed over to local laeders after the Romans made their hasty "withdrawl" from Britain. Regional conflicts meant properties and estates were destroyed and perfect for any exotics to escape -there is no suggestion thatthese were the progenitors of today's cats!

Traders handed chiefs exotics as gifts -baboons, cats and so on. The first official Royal menagerie was created in the 1100s and, of course, the nobility on seeing the animals kept by the King followed the same route as today's trendies -they set up their own private menageries -exotic birds, cats and so on and so forth. 


Early handbill for the Exeter Change Menagerie

There were various escapes and hunts over the centuries as well as deaths. Some exotics may not have quite been 'escapees' but released for sport (no one was going to question or chastise the nobility!). Wolf and bear baiting were popular along with bull baiting and the horrendous acts of cruelty are probably not right to describe here.

Keeping animals penned in was not a priority. Escapes of primates including gorillas and the fact that gorillas were in the UK before being discovered is covered in Some More Things Strange & Sinister.

The big explosion in exotics began during the Regency period in the 1700s although it did not start then obviously. Come the Victorian age and hunting, shooting and killing anything was all the rage as was the collecting of wild animals for the new menageries -Inns, railway stations and other locations often had  their own littel zoos for patrons. 1831 and 1844 are notable for two deaths caused by panthers -both in menageries and in one case animal cruelty may have been involved leading to the death.

When estate owners went into debt or bankruptcy animals were sold off or possibly neglected and those that could were allowed to fend for themselves in the wild. Certainly there are rumours of estate owners dying and the family member taking over "vanished" the animals (or as we would say today -released them on the quiet).

The Victorian period was probably the point in history that saw the largest number of escapes and escapees living in the wild. 


American soldiers with the regimental mascot lion cub, Susan. NARA/165-WW-472A-056/CROPPED

   Then came World War One. As war loomed it is said that many menagerie owners felt that their charges would die of starvation or a vets bullet or poison. Similar happened during WW Two when thousands of pets were killed for the same belief that they would starve. Killing exotics was not something that many owners were going to do and with thousands of rabbits as well as deer running around -any cat or other animal released could feed itself. "Have a fighting chance" -and there was always the possibility that these were good times to get rid of costly pets. Mascots such as puma and bears were brought to the UK by Colonial forces and many ended up as gifts to zoos which...werre publicly happy.

One thing noted is that the number of puma, panther and lynx sightings begins anew in the 1920s and 1930s and going into WW 2 there is a story I was told of a British Army officer who entered a military radio shack and told the operators to stop kicking up a fuss about "a bloody great cat" that was being seen. It was only a lynx that belonged to some local well off. 

Cat sightings continued into the 1950s and 1960s and the 1976 DWA did result in some releases but we know through later admissions that some cats released had bred and the former owners escaped prosecutions as "the release took place prior to the implementation of the Act" (they claimed).

The DWA required that owners were informed prior to any inspections of the cages etc that animals were kept in. These inspections were mainly to make sure that the correct number of animals and licences were in order. I was told by some exotic keepers that this inspection was a joke. Often a quick look and "Yes. One howler monkey" and that was it followed by a cup of tea. There were no questions about breeding taking place. A person breeding raccoons or a cat got the inspection letter and he and his mate transported the "extra" animals to another location -returning them home after the inspection. You did not have to report breeding successes just have the right cage and the right number of animals as per licence.

During 1996  my interest in these cats was misunderstood by individuals and I was offered three pairs of puma and two pairs of panthers "no questions asked" and good for breeding. once I explained what my interest was the calers put the phone down!

That "new stock" is occasionally added to the Old wild stock is obvious. On a number of occasions there have been very close encounters with panthers but they have been wary but not threatening. Almost tame (though this noted in one cat was gone after a year and it avoided people at all costs and quickly). 


Above: again, despite claims, there has never been a report of a jaguar from South America on the loose in the UK. That is a fantasy.

Yes, to shut up the sceptics, we do get the occasional spotted variety of leopard but these reports are rare.  To answer another flase claim made by "Big Cat" investigators: a panther will not mate with a puma in the wild. Neither a puma nor a panther will mate with lynx or any other breed of cat. 

I have written before about black pumas. For many years I listened to the dogma of people who did neither the research or field work. You cannot have a black puma. "There have only been two individuals in 150 years". So, black pumas are impossible but there have been two?  Melanism is mainly a South American puma trait -well many animals including jaguar and pumas were imported from South America during the Victorian period. I spoke to people at the BBC Natural History Unit who had been to Florida and noted that "there are good reports of black pumas".  

Then I read the old books by people who hunted and trapped cats over decades and especially pumas and guess what? They caught or killed black pumas and then I read up on colouration in cats and particularly pumas and found that there was no reason why a puma could not be black. 

I started reviewing the reports and as new ones came in I realised that the black cats with no visible markings were not panthers and people who were in very close proximity to the cats described the head and facial markings as well as the thick tail of a puma. 

Then came the clincher. I was contacted privately by a very senior lecturer in zoology who had carried out work for other countries including Canada where he became familiar with pumas. He was driving along a quiet road in Wales under perfect viewing conditions when he stopped his car -100 yards/105m from him a large black cat stopped in the middle of the road and looked toward him before moving off. I asked him if he was sure that it was a puma not a panther? His response was that as a zoologist he had noted all the diagnostic features of a puma and that had it been a panther he would never have gotten out of the car to go and take measurements for his notes.

I have his signed letter in front of me. A biologist who argued that "he probably saw a panther" (but denied on TV and radio that such animals were in the UK) refused flatly the offer to speak directly to and question the validity of the statement of the zoologist. 

There ARE black puma.

And, yes, large cats have been captured and killed on DEFRA authorisation and my solicitor has the affidavit from the witness to this under lock and key. 



Pages  20
Binding Saddle Stitch
Interior Color (photographs)
Dimensions A4 (8.27 x 11.69 in / 210 x 297 mm)
UK £15.00
https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/the-current-threat-to-uk-fauna-and-the-introduction-of-new-fauna-species/paperback/product-j4m9r7.html?page=1&pageSize=4

 In the United Kingdom new species of fauna have been introduced since Roman times and the number of species released or escaping into the countryside since 1900 has steadily increased. New species are filling in niches left by species extirpated by humans and these new species have, after 40+ years of observation created no problems.

Despite this the official policy of the UK Government and the Department for Environment Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is to class such species "invasive" and trap and kill them as the opportunity arises.

This paper suggests that DEFRA needs to reassess its stance since it is impossible to exterminate all established "invasive species" -the New fauna now closely tied to the Old fauna,

Sunday 10 April 2022

The Current Threat To UK Fauna And The Introduction Of New Fauna Species -a look inside

 


Pages  20
Binding Saddle Stitch
Interior Color (photographs)
Dimensions A4 (8.27 x 11.69 in / 210 x 297 mm)
UK £15.00
https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/the-current-threat-to-uk-fauna-and-the-introduction-of-new-fauna-species/paperback/product-j4m9r7.html?page=1&pageSize=4

 In the United Kingdom new species of fauna have been introduced since Roman times and the number of species released or escaping into the countryside since 1900 has steadily increased. New species are filling in niches left by species extirpated by humans and these new species have, after 40+ years of observation created no problems.

Despite this the official policy of the UK Government and the Department for Environment Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is to class such species "invasive" and trap and kill them as the opportunity arises.
This paper suggests that DEFRA needs to reassess its stance since it is impossible to exterminate all established "invasive species" -the New fauna now closely tied to the Old fauna,




Photo of Animal Found Dead In UK

 I am going to ask (I know no one bothers but... ) for opinions. I can tell you:  1) There is a series of three photos   2) The photos are 1...